전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌

속보

더보기

오바마 2013 국정연설 원문 - 1

기사입력 :

최종수정 :

※ 본문 글자 크기 조정

  • 더 작게
  • 작게
  • 보통
  • 크게
  • 더 크게

※ 번역할 언어 선택

President Obama's State of the Union Address:

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, fellow citizens:

Fifty-one years ago, John F. Kennedy declared to this Chamber that "the Constitution makes us not rivals for power but partners for progress…It is my task," he said, "to report the State of the Union – to improve it is the task of us all."

Tonight, thanks to the grit and determination of the American people, there is much progress to report. After a decade of grinding war, our brave men and women in uniform are coming home. After years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over six million new jobs. We buy more American cars than we have in five years, and less foreign oil than we have in twenty. Our housing market is healing, our stock market is rebounding, and consumers, patients, and homeowners enjoy stronger protections than ever before.

Together, we have cleared away the rubble of crisis, and can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is stronger.

But we gather here knowing that there are millions of Americans whose hard work and dedication have not yet been rewarded. Our economy is adding jobs – but too many people still can't find full-time employment. Corporate profits have rocketed to all-time highs – but for more than a decade, wages and incomes have barely budged.

It is our generation's task, then, to reignite the true engine of America's economic growth – a rising, thriving middle class.

It is our unfinished task to restore the basic bargain that built this country – the idea that if you work hard and meet your responsibilities, you can get ahead, no matter where you come from, what you look like, or who you love.

It is our unfinished task to make sure that this government works on behalf of the many, and not just the few; that it encourages free enterprise, rewards individual initiative, and opens the doors of opportunity to every child across this great nation.

The American people don't expect government to solve every problem. They don't expect those of us in this chamber to agree on every issue. But they do expect us to put the nation's interests before party. They do expect us to forge reasonable compromise where we can. For they know that America moves forward only when we do so together; and that the responsibility of improving this union remains the task of us all.

Our work must begin by making some basic decisions about our budget – decisions that will have a huge impact on the strength of our recovery.

Over the last few years, both parties have worked together to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion – mostly through spending cuts, but also by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. As a result, we are more than halfway towards the goal of $4 trillion in deficit reduction that economists say we need to stabilize our finances.

Now we need to finish the job. And the question is, how?

In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn't agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars' worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year. These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They'd devastate priorities like education, energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That's why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as "the sequester," are a really bad idea.

Now, some in this Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training; Medicare and Social Security benefits.

That idea is even worse. Yes, the biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population. And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms – otherwise, our retirement programs will crowd out the investments we need for our children, and jeopardize the promise of a secure retirement for future generations.

But we can't ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and most powerful. We won't grow the middle class simply by shifting the cost of health care or college onto families that are already struggling, or by forcing communities to lay off more teachers, cops, and firefighters. Most Americans – Democrats, Republicans, and Independents – understand that we can't just cut our way to prosperity. They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that's the approach I offer tonight.

On Medicare, I'm prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission. Already, the Affordable Care Act is helping to slow the growth of health care costs. The reforms I'm proposing go even further. We'll reduce taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies and ask more from the wealthiest seniors. We'll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn't be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital – they should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive. And I am open to additional reforms from both parties, so long as they don't violate the guarantee of a secure retirement. Our government shouldn't make promises we cannot keep – but we must keep the promises we've already made.

To hit the rest of our deficit reduction target, we should do what leaders in both parties have already suggested, and save hundreds of billions of dollars by getting rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well-off and well-connected. After all, why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special interest tax breaks? How is that fair? How does that promote growth?

Now is our best chance for bipartisan, comprehensive tax reform that encourages job creation and helps bring down the deficit. The American people deserve a tax code that helps small businesses spend less time filling out complicated forms, and more time expanding and hiring; a tax code that ensures billionaires with high-powered accountants can't pay a lower rate than their hard-working secretaries; a tax code that lowers incentives to move jobs overseas, and lowers tax rates for businesses and manufacturers that create jobs right here in America. That's what tax reform can deliver. That's what we can do together.

I realize that tax reform and entitlement reform won't be easy. The politics will be hard for both sides. None of us will get 100 percent of what we want. But the alternative will cost us jobs, hurt our economy, and visit hardship on millions of hardworking Americans. So let's set party interests aside, and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future. And let's do it without the brinksmanship that stresses consumers and scares off investors. The greatest nation on Earth cannot keep conducting its business by drifting from one manufactured crisis to the next. Let's agree, right here, right now, to keep the people's government open, pay our bills on time, and always uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America. The American people have worked too hard, for too long, rebuilding from one crisis to see their elected officials cause another.

Now, most of us agree that a plan to reduce the deficit must be part of our agenda. But let's be clear: deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan. A growing economy that creates good, middle-class jobs – that must be the North Star that guides our efforts. Every day, we should ask ourselves three questions as a nation: How do we attract more jobs to our shores? How do we equip our people with the skills needed to do those jobs? And how do we make sure that hard work leads to a decent living?

(계속)


[뉴스핌 Newspim]

[관련키워드]

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
한낮 39도 극한 폭염 [서울=뉴스핌] 유재선 기자 = 월요일인 3일은 전국 대부분 지역에서 폭염과 열대야가 이어질 전망이다. 기상청과 케이웨더에 따르면 이날 전국 대부분 지역에 발효된 폭염특보가 계속되는 가운데 한낮 최고기온은 39도까지 오를 전망이다. 강원남부내륙과 충북북부에는 곳에 따라 5~10mm 소나기가 내리겠다. 월요일인 3일은 전국 대부분 지역에서 폭염과 열대야가 이어지는 가운데 낮 최고 기온이 39도까지 올라 무덥겠다. 사진은 따가운 햇볕을 맞으며 이동하고 있는 시민들의 모습. [사진=뉴스핌DB] 아침 최저기온은 23~27도로 예상된다. ▲서울 26도 ▲인천 26도 ▲수원 26도 ▲춘천 25도 ▲강릉 26도 ▲청주 26도 ▲대전 25도 ▲전주 26도 ▲광주 26도 ▲대구 26도 ▲부산 27도 ▲울산 26도 ▲제주 27도다. 낮 최고기온은 32~39도로 예상된다. ▲서울 37도 ▲인천 34도 ▲수원 36도 ▲춘천 35도 ▲강릉 34도 ▲청주 37도 ▲대전 37도 ▲전주 36도 ▲광주 39도 ▲대구 39도 ▲부산 35도 ▲울산 35도 ▲제주 34도다. 바다 물결은 서해 앞바다 0.5m, 남해 앞바다 0.5~1.0m, 동해 앞바다 0.5~1.0m로 일겠다. 에어코리아에 따르면 이날 미세먼지 농도는 전 권역에서 오전, 오후 모두 '보통' 수준을 보이겠다. jason14@newspim.com 2026-08-03 06:30
사진
정청래, PK경선 승리 [서울=뉴스핌] 송기욱 기자 = 정청래 더불어민주당 당대표 후보가 부산·울산·경남 순회경선에서 김민석 후보에 승리하며 2일 기준 권리당원 누적 득표 1위로 올라섰다. 전날 충청권 경선에서 김 후보에게 근소하게 밀렸던 정 후보는 이날 울산·부산·경남 투표 결과를 더한 누적 집계에서 김 후보를 1211표 차로 앞질렀다. 다만 두 후보 간 누적 득표율 격차는 0.99%p에 불과해 초반 경선부터 치열한 접전 구도가 형성됐다. 민주당 중앙당선거관리위원회는 이날 부울경 합동연설회를 마친 뒤 울산·부산·경남 권리당원 투표 결과를 발표했다. 부울경 투표자수는 총 5만3993명이다. 부울경 투표에서 정 후보는 2만5189표를 얻어 46.65%를 기록했다. 김 후보는 2만3675표, 43.85%로 뒤를 이었다. 송영길 후보는 5129표, 9.50%였다. 정 후보는 울산에서 4054표로 김 후보(4337표)에 뒤졌으나 부산에서 1만345표를 얻어 김 후보(9182표)를 앞섰다. 경남에서도 정 후보는 1만790표를 기록해 김 후보(1만156표)를 눌렀다. 전날 충청권에서는 김 후보가 3만632표, 45.05%로 1위를 차지했다. 정 후보는 3만329표, 44.61%로 303표 차 2위였고, 송 후보는 7027표, 10.34%를 기록했다. [부산=뉴스핌] 김현우 기자 = 송영길·정청래·김민석 더불어민주당 당대표 후보가 2일 오후 부산 해운대구 백스코 컨벤션홀에서 열린 당대표·최고위원 합동연설회에서 정견 발표를 하고 있다. 2026.08.02 khwphoto@newspim.com 충청권과 부울경 결과를 합산하면 정 후보는 5만5518표, 45.51%로 누적 1위에 올랐다. 김 후보는 5만4307표, 44.52%로 2위다. 송 후보는 1만2156표, 9.97%를 기록했다. 정 후보와 김 후보의 누적 격차는 1211표에 불과하다. 전날 충청권에서 김 후보가 근소하게 앞섰지만, 정 후보가 부울경에서 1514표를 더 얻으며 하루 만에 순위를 뒤집은 셈이다. 민주당은 앞으로 남은 지역 순회경선과 대의원·일반 여론조사 결과 등을 반영해 최종 당대표를 선출할 예정이다. oneway@newspim.com 2026-08-02 19:58
기사 번역
결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.
종목 추적기

S&P 500 기업 중 기사 내용이 영향을 줄 종목 추적

결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.

긍정 영향 종목

  • Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials
    우크라이나 안보 지원 강화 기대감으로 방산 수요 증가 직접적. 미·러 긴장 완화 불확실성 속에서도 방위산업 매출 안정성 강화 예상됨.

부정 영향 종목

  • Caterpillar Inc. Industrials
    우크라이나 전쟁 장기화 시 건설 및 중장비 수요 불확실성 직접적. 글로벌 인프라 투자 지연으로 매출 성장 둔화 가능성 있음.
이 내용에 포함된 데이터와 의견은 뉴스핌 AI가 분석한 결과입니다. 정보 제공 목적으로만 작성되었으며, 특정 종목 매매를 권유하지 않습니다. 투자 판단 및 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 주식 투자는 원금 손실 가능성이 있으므로, 투자 전 충분한 조사와 전문가 상담을 권장합니다.
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동