전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌·중국 미국·북미

제롬 파월 연준 의장의 잭슨홀 연설(영문)

기사입력 :

최종수정 :

※ 본문 글자 크기 조정

  • 더 작게
  • 작게
  • 보통
  • 크게
  • 더 크게

※ 번역할 언어 선택

[휴스턴=뉴스핌] 고인원 특파원= 제롬 파월 연준 의장은 2023년 8월 25일 잭슨홀 심포지엄에서 '글로벌 경제의 구조적 변화'을 주제로 연설했다.

이날 파월은 "인플레이션이 여전히 높으며 적절하다고 판단되면 추가 금리 인상이 가능하다"는 매파 발언으로 시장에 충격파를 던졌다.

다음은 미 연준 홈페이지에 게재된 파월 의장의 연설문 전문이다. 원문 그대로 게재한다.

Good morning. At last year's Jackson Hole symposium, I delivered a brief, direct message. My remarks this year will be a bit longer, but the message is the same: It is the Fed's job to bring inflation down to our 2 percent goal, and we will do so. We have tightened policy significantly over the past year. Although inflation has moved down from its peak—a welcome development—it remains too high. We are prepared to raise rates further if appropriate, and intend to hold policy at a restrictive level until we are confident that inflation is moving sustainably down toward our objective.

Today I will review our progress so far and discuss the outlook and the uncertainties we face as we pursue our dual mandate goals. I will conclude with a summary of what this means for policy. Given how far we have come, at upcoming meetings we are in a position to proceed carefully as we assess the incoming data and the evolving outlook and risks.

The Decline in Inflation So Far
The ongoing episode of high inflation initially emerged from a collision between very strong demand and pandemic-constrained supply. By the time the Federal Open Market Committee raised the policy rate in March 2022, it was clear that bringing down inflation would depend on both the unwinding of the unprecedented pandemic-related demand and supply distortions and on our tightening of monetary policy, which would slow the growth of aggregate demand, allowing supply time to catch up. While these two forces are now working together to bring down inflation, the process still has a long way to go, even with the more favorable recent readings.

On a 12-month basis, U.S. total, or "headline," PCE (personal consumption expenditures) inflation peaked at 7 percent in June 2022 and declined to 3.3 percent as of July, following a trajectory roughly in line with global trends (figure 1, panel A).1 The effects of Russia's war against Ukraine have been a primary driver of the changes in headline inflation around the world since early 2022. Headline inflation is what households and businesses experience most directly, so this decline is very good news. But food and energy prices are influenced by global factors that remain volatile, and can provide a misleading signal of where inflation is headed. In my remaining comments, I will focus on core PCE inflation, which omits the food and energy components.

On a 12-month basis, core PCE inflation peaked at 5.4 percent in February 2022 and declined gradually to 4.3 percent in July (figure 1, panel B). The lower monthly readings for core inflation in June and July were welcome, but two months of good data are only the beginning of what it will take to build confidence that inflation is moving down sustainably toward our goal. We can't yet know the extent to which these lower readings will continue or where underlying inflation will settle over coming quarters. Twelve-month core inflation is still elevated, and there is substantial further ground to cover to get back to price stability.

To understand the factors that will likely drive further progress, it is useful to separately examine the three broad components of core PCE inflation—inflation for goods, for housing services, and for all other services, sometimes referred to as nonhousing services (figure 2).

Core goods inflation has fallen sharply, particularly for durable goods, as both tighter monetary policy and the slow unwinding of supply and demand dislocations are bringing it down. The motor vehicle sector provides a good illustration. Earlier in the pandemic, demand for vehicles rose sharply, supported by low interest rates, fiscal transfers, curtailed spending on in-person services, and shifts in preference away from using public transportation and from living in cities. But because of a shortage of semiconductors, vehicle supply actually fell. Vehicle prices spiked, and a large pool of pent-up demand emerged. As the pandemic and its effects have waned, production and inventories have grown, and supply has improved. At the same time, higher interest rates have weighed on demand. Interest rates on auto loans have nearly doubled since early last year, and customers report feeling the effect of higher rates on affordability.2 On net, motor vehicle inflation has declined sharply because of the combined effects of these supply and demand factors.

Similar dynamics are playing out for core goods inflation overall. As they do, the effects of monetary restraint should show through more fully over time. Core goods prices fell the past two months, but on a 12-month basis, core goods inflation remains well above its pre-pandemic level. Sustained progress is needed, and restrictive monetary policy is called for to achieve that progress.

In the highly interest-sensitive housing sector, the effects of monetary policy became apparent soon after liftoff. Mortgage rates doubled over the course of 2022, causing housing starts and sales to fall and house price growth to plummet. Growth in market rents soon peaked and then steadily declined (figure 3).3

Measured housing services inflation lagged these changes, as is typical, but has recently begun to fall. This inflation metric reflects rents paid by all tenants, as well as estimates of the equivalent rents that could be earned from homes that are owner occupied.4 Because leases turn over slowly, it takes time for a decline in market rent growth to work its way into the overall inflation measure. The market rent slowdown has only recently begun to show through to that measure. The slowing growth in rents for new leases over roughly the past year can be thought of as "in the pipeline" and will affect measured housing services inflation over the coming year. Going forward, if market rent growth settles near pre-pandemic levels, housing services inflation should decline toward its pre-pandemic level as well. We will continue to watch the market rent data closely for a signal of the upside and downside risks to housing services inflation.

The final category, nonhousing services, accounts for over half of the core PCE index and includes a broad range of services, such as health care, food services, transportation, and accommodations. Twelve-month inflation in this sector has moved sideways since liftoff. Inflation measured over the past three and six months has declined, however, which is encouraging. Part of the reason for the modest decline of nonhousing services inflation so far is that many of these services were less affected by global supply chain bottlenecks and are generally thought to be less interest sensitive than other sectors such as housing or durable goods. Production of these services is also relatively labor intensive, and the labor market remains tight. Given the size of this sector, some further progress here will be essential to restoring price stability. Over time, restrictive monetary policy will help bring aggregate supply and demand back into better balance, reducing inflationary pressures in this key sector.

The Outlook
Turning to the outlook, although further unwinding of pandemic-related distortions should continue to put some downward pressure on inflation, restrictive monetary policy will likely play an increasingly important role. Getting inflation sustainably back down to 2 percent is expected to require a period of below-trend economic growth as well as some softening in labor market conditions.

Economic growth
Restrictive monetary policy has tightened financial conditions, supporting the expectation of below-trend growth.5 Since last year's symposium, the two-year real yield is up about 250 basis points, and longer-term real yields are higher as well—by nearly 150 basis points.6 Beyond changes in interest rates, bank lending standards have tightened, and loan growth has slowed sharply.7 Such a tightening of broad financial conditions typically contributes to a slowing in the growth of economic activity, and there is evidence of that in this cycle as well. For example, growth in industrial production has slowed, and the amount spent on residential investment has declined in each of the past five quarters (figure 4).

But we are attentive to signs that the economy may not be cooling as expected. So far this year, GDP (gross domestic product) growth has come in above expectations and above its longer-run trend, and recent readings on consumer spending have been especially robust. In addition, after decelerating sharply over the past 18 months, the housing sector is showing signs of picking back up. Additional evidence of persistently above-trend growth could put further progress on inflation at risk and could warrant further tightening of monetary policy.

The labor market
The rebalancing of the labor market has continued over the past year but remains incomplete. Labor supply has improved, driven by stronger participation among workers aged 25 to 54 and by an increase in immigration back toward pre-pandemic levels. Indeed, the labor force participation rate of women in their prime working years reached an all-time high in June. Demand for labor has moderated as well. Job openings remain high but are trending lower. Payroll job growth has slowed significantly. Total hours worked has been flat over the past six months, and the average workweek has declined to the lower end of its pre-pandemic range, reflecting a gradual normalization in labor market conditions (figure 5).

This rebalancing has eased wage pressures. Wage growth across a range of measures continues to slow, albeit gradually (figure 6). While nominal wage growth must ultimately slow to a rate that is consistent with 2 percent inflation, what matters for households is real wage growth. Even as nominal wage growth has slowed, real wage growth has been increasing as inflation has fallen.

We expect this labor market rebalancing to continue. Evidence that the tightness in the labor market is no longer easing could also call for a monetary policy response.

Uncertainty and Risk Management along the Path Forward
Two percent is and will remain our inflation target. We are committed to achieving and sustaining a stance of monetary policy that is sufficiently restrictive to bring inflation down to that level over time. It is challenging, of course, to know in real time when such a stance has been achieved. There are some challenges that are common to all tightening cycles. For example, real interest rates are now positive and well above mainstream estimates of the neutral policy rate. We see the current stance of policy as restrictive, putting downward pressure on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. But we cannot identify with certainty the neutral rate of interest, and thus there is always uncertainty about the precise level of monetary policy restraint.

That assessment is further complicated by uncertainty about the duration of the lags with which monetary tightening affects economic activity and especially inflation. Since the symposium a year ago, the Committee has raised the policy rate by 300 basis points, including 100 basis points over the past seven months. And we have substantially reduced the size of our securities holdings. The wide range of estimates of these lags suggests that there may be significant further drag in the pipeline.

Beyond these traditional sources of policy uncertainty, the supply and demand dislocations unique to this cycle raise further complications through their effects on inflation and labor market dynamics. For example, so far, job openings have declined substantially without increasing unemployment—a highly welcome but historically unusual result that appears to reflect large excess demand for labor. In addition, there is evidence that inflation has become more responsive to labor market tightness than was the case in recent decades.8 These changing dynamics may or may not persist, and this uncertainty underscores the need for agile policymaking.

These uncertainties, both old and new, complicate our task of balancing the risk of tightening monetary policy too much against the risk of tightening too little. Doing too little could allow above-target inflation to become entrenched and ultimately require monetary policy to wring more persistent inflation from the economy at a high cost to employment. Doing too much could also do unnecessary harm to the economy.

Conclusion
As is often the case, we are navigating by the stars under cloudy skies. In such circumstances, risk-management considerations are critical. At upcoming meetings, we will assess our progress based on the totality of the data and the evolving outlook and risks. Based on this assessment, we will proceed carefully as we decide whether to tighten further or, instead, to hold the policy rate constant and await further data. Restoring price stability is essential to achieving both sides of our dual mandate. We will need price stability to achieve a sustained period of strong labor market conditions that benefit all.

We will keep at it until the job is done.

koinwon@newspim.com

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
'한덕수 재판 위증' 尹 오늘 선고 [서울=뉴스핌] 박민경 기자 = 한덕수 전 국무총리의 내란 재판에 증인으로 출석해 허위 증언한 혐의로 추가 기소된 윤석열 전 대통령의 1심 선고기일이 28일 열린다. 서울중앙지법 형사합의32부(재판장 류경진)는 이날 오전 10시 윤 전 대통령의 위증 혐의 1심 선고기일을 진행한다. 내란 특검팀(특별검사 조은석)은 지난 결심 공판에서 윤 전 대통령에게 징역 2년의 실형을 구형했다. 이에 윤 전 대통령 측은 위증죄가 성립하지 않아 무죄가 선고되어야 한다고 맞섰다. 한덕수 전 국무총리의 내란 재판에 증인으로 출석해 허위 증언한 혐의로 추가 기소된 윤석열 전 대통령의 1심 선고기일이 28일 열린다. 사진은 윤 전 대통령. [사진=뉴스핌DB] 윤 전 대통령은 지난해 11월 한 전 총리의 내란 중요임무 종사 등 혐의 재판에 증인으로 출석해 한 전 총리의 건의 전부터 국무회의를 계획한 것처럼 허위로 증언한 혐의로 기소됐다. 당시 재판에서 한 전 총리가 12·3 비상계엄의 합법적 외관을 갖추기 위해 국무회의 소집을 건의했느냐는 특검 측 질문에 '처음부터 국무회의 심의를 거쳐 선포할 계획이었다'는 취지로 답변했다. 특검팀은 윤 전 대통령이 계엄 선포 당일 국무회의 개최 의사가 없었으나, 한 전 총리 건의에 뒤늦게 국무위원들을 소집했다고 보고 있다. 이와 함께 강의구 전 대통령실 부속실장의 허위 공문서 작성, 공용물 손상, 대통령기록물에 관한 법률 위반 등 혐의 1심 선고기일도 이날 열린다. 같은 법원 형사합의30부(재판장 박옥희)는 이날 오후 2시 강 전 실장에 허위 공문서 작성, 공용물 손상, 대통령기록물에 관한 법률 위반 등 혐의 1심 선고기일을 진행한다. 특검팀은 지난 4월 29일 강 전 실장의 결심 공판에서 징역 5년을 선고해달라고 요청했다. 특검은 강 전 실장이 윤 전 대통령, 한 전 총리, 김용현 전 국방부 장관과 공모해 12·3 비상계엄 선포가 헌법에 따른 국무총리와 관계 국무위원의 부서가 있는 문서에 의해 이루어진 것처럼 보이게 하고, 이를 탄핵 심판 절차와 수사기관에 행사할 목적으로 계엄 선포문을 허위로 작성한 것으로 조사했다. 또 특검은 이후 강 전 실장이 해당 문서를 부속실에 보관하다 손상한 것으로 판단해 강 전 실장을 지난해 12월 4일 허위 공문서 작성 등 혐의로 불구속 기소했다. 강의구 전 대통령실 부속실장의 허위 공문서 작성, 공용물 손상, 대통령기록물에 관한 법률 위반 등 혐의 1심 선고기일이 28일 열린다. 사진은 12·3 비상계엄 당시 사후 계엄선포문을 작성한 혐의를 받는 강 전 실장이 지난 4월 8일 오후 서울 서초구 서울중앙지방법원에서 열린 공판에 출석하고 있는 모습. [사진=뉴스핌DB] pmk1459@newspim.com 2026-05-28 05:02
사진
서울 정원오 48.8% 오세훈 41.4% [서울=뉴스핌] 박서영 기자 = 6·3 지방선거가 1주일 앞으로 다가온 가운데 서울시장 선거에 출마한 정원오 더불어민주당 후보와 오세훈 국민의힘 후보 지지도 차이가 7.4%포인트(p)인 것으로 27일 조사됐다. 종합뉴스통신사 뉴스핌이 리얼미터에 의뢰해 지난 24~25일 서울 18살 이상 803명을 대상으로 실시한 후보 지지도 조사 결과, 정 후보 48.8%, 오 후보 41.4%다. 두 사람의 격차는 근소하게 오차범위 밖이다. ◆"정원오, 과반 가까운 지지율 확보"…"오세훈, 여전히 경쟁력 유지"  김정철 개혁신당 후보는 1.9%, 기타 후보 2.2%, '없음' 2.4%, '잘 모름' 3.4%였다. 리얼미터는 "정 후보가 과반인 50%에 가까운 지지율을 확보하며 우위를 점한 가운데, 최근 서울 민심의 변화 흐름과 정권 안정론이 일정 부분 반영된 결과"라며 "오 후보도 40%대 초반의 지지율을 보이며 여전히 경쟁력을 유지한 것으로 조사됐다"고 분석했다.  지역별로는 ▲동북권(강북구, 광진구, 노원구, 도봉구, 동대문구, 성동구, 성북구, 중랑구) 정 후보 54.8%, 오 후보 35.5% ▲서북권(마포구, 서대문구, 용산구, 은평구, 종로구, 중구) 정 후보 49.9%, 오 후보 39.0% ▲서남권(강서구, 관악구, 구로구, 금천구, 동작구, 양천구, 영등포구) 정 후보 49.9%, 오 후보 41.4% ▲동남권(강남구, 강동구, 서초구, 송파구) 정 후보 38.0%, 오 후보 51.6%였다. 강남구와 강동구, 서초구, 송파구의 서울 동남권을 제외한 모든 지역서 정 후보가 크게 앞서는 흐름이다.  연령별로는 ▲18~29살 정 후보 36.5%, 오 후보 43.8% ▲30대 정 후보 35.6%, 오 후보 55.1% ▲40대 정 후보 56.0%, 오 후보 32.8% ▲50대 정 후보 69.1%, 오 후보 24.6% ▲60대 정 후보 53.7%, 오 후보 40.8% ▲70세 이상 정 후보 41.7%, 오 후보 52.4%다. 20대와 30대, 70살 이상에서는 오 후보, 40대와 50대, 60대에서는 정 후보가 많이 앞섰다.  ◆'적극 투표층' 정 후보 53.6%, 오 후보 40.6%…격차 더 벌어져  성별로는 ▲남성 정 후보 46.7%, 오 후보 43.5% ▲여성 정 후보 50.8%, 오 후보 39.5%다.  정 후보는 여성 유권자에서 크게 앞섰다.  지지 정당별로는 민주당 지지층의 91.8%가 정 후보, 국민의힘 지지층 89.9%가 오 후보를 지지했다. 조국혁신당 지지층은 정 후보 70.9%, 오 후보 22.5%, 진보당 지지층은 정 후보 56.2%, 오 후보 8.0%다. 개혁신당 지지층은 정 후보 19.3%, 오 후보 61.9%, 김 후보 12.0%로 조사됐다. 투표 의향 별로는 '적극 투표층'에서 정 후보 53.6%, 오 후보 40.6%였다. 이번 조사는 무선 전화 가상번호(100%)를 활용한 자동응답(ARS) 방식으로 진행됐다. 표본오차는 95% 신뢰수준에서 ±3.5%p, 응답률은 6.7%다. 성별·연령대·권역별 인구 비례에 따른 가중치를 줬다. 2026년 4월 말 행정안전부 주민등록인구통계를 기준으로 했다. 자세한 내용은 중앙선거여론조사심의위원회 홈페이지를 참조하면 된다. seo00@newspim.com 2026-05-27 05:00
기사 번역
결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.
종목 추적기

S&P 500 기업 중 기사 내용이 영향을 줄 종목 추적

결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.

긍정 영향 종목

  • Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials
    우크라이나 안보 지원 강화 기대감으로 방산 수요 증가 직접적. 미·러 긴장 완화 불확실성 속에서도 방위산업 매출 안정성 강화 예상됨.

부정 영향 종목

  • Caterpillar Inc. Industrials
    우크라이나 전쟁 장기화 시 건설 및 중장비 수요 불확실성 직접적. 글로벌 인프라 투자 지연으로 매출 성장 둔화 가능성 있음.
이 내용에 포함된 데이터와 의견은 뉴스핌 AI가 분석한 결과입니다. 정보 제공 목적으로만 작성되었으며, 특정 종목 매매를 권유하지 않습니다. 투자 판단 및 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 주식 투자는 원금 손실 가능성이 있으므로, 투자 전 충분한 조사와 전문가 상담을 권장합니다.
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동